Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America; December 2009; v. 99; no. 6; p. 3340-3354; DOI: 10.1785/0120080346
© 2009 Seismological Society of America
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Song, G.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

An Explicit Method Based on the Implicit Runge–Kutta Algorithm for Solving Wave Equations

Dinghui Yang, Nian Wang, Shan Chen, and Guojie Song

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China dhyang{at}math.tsinghua.edu.cn

A new explicit differentiator series method based on the implicit Runge–Kutta method, called the IRK-DSM in brief, is developed for solving wave equations. To develop the new algorithm, we first transform the wave equation, usually described as a partial differential equation (PDE), into a system of first-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs) with respect to time t. Then we use a truncated differentiator series method of the implicit Runge–Kutta method to solve the semidiscrete ordinary differential equations, while the high-order spatial derivatives included in the ODEs are approximated by the local interpolation method. We analyze the theoretical properties of the IRK-DSM, including the stability criteria for solving the 1D and 2D acoustic-wave equations, numerical dispersion, discretizing error, and computational efficiency when using the IRK-DSM to model acoustic-wave fields. For comparison, we also present the stability criteria and numerical dispersion of the so-called Lax–Wendroff correction (LWC) methods with the fourth-order and eighth-order accuracies for the 1D case. Promising numerical results show that the IRK-DSM provides a useful tool for large-scale practical problems because it can effectively suppress numerical dispersions and source-noises caused by discretizing the acoustic- and elastic-wave equations when too-coarse grids are used or the models have a large velocity contrast between adjacent layers. Theoretical analysis and numerical modeling also demonstrate that the IRK-DSM, through combining both the implicit Runge–Kutta scheme with good stability condition and the approximate differentiator series method, is a robust wave-field modeling method.







JOURNAL HOME HELP CONTACT PUBLISHER SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 by Seismological Society of America